A power calculation was performed, but the study did not recruit enough participants to meet this threshold and to appropriately measure to main outcome. Patients included in the study did not differ between the two groups with respect to age, sex and number of vaccine injections administered. No relevant health technology assessments, systematic reviews and non-randomized studies were identified regarding the effectiveness of skin preparation prior to injections. While patients and others may access this document, the document is made available for informational purposes only and no representations or warranties are made with respect to its fitness for any particular purpose. Due to the limitations of the study it is difficult to draw sound conclusions of whether alcohol swabbing reduces infection rates compared to no swabbing.

Nothing is more important in the lab, manufacturing facility or other workplace as your health and safety.Subject to the aforementioned limitations, the views expressed herein are those of CADTH and do not necessarily represent the views of Canada’s federal, provincial, or territorial governments or any third party supplier of information.

An example of skin preparation is when health professionals wipe (or swab) an alcohol or other disinfectant solution before they administer an injectable or when withdrawing blood from an individual. To the contrary, the Public Health Agency of Canada 6 advises the practice of cleaning the skin with a suitable antiseptic solution prior to vaccination or injection. Medisave Professional pre injection swabs are identical in quality, design and performance to our best selling RB5885 pre injection swabs.Avantor® can help with a robust line of safety products and personal protective equipment -- from waste bins to safety signs. The study was underpowered to report on the primary outcome of the study (skin infection) while the recruitment rate was slightly lower than the target of 50% of eligible patients (44% for alcohol swab group and 50% for control group recruited) and 21% of parents did not provide diary or phone interview data during the follow-up period. Patients were excluded if the parent was not fluent in English, previously participated in a similar study, the child had a documented allergy to isopropyl alcohol, were taking antibiotics, had a vaccine contradiction or was unavailable for the duration of post-vaccination follow-up.